← 목록

VectraRAT: A MaaS with Custom TCP C2 and UAC Bypass

devto 2026-09-17 원문 보기 ↗


1. Basic Information

2. Executive Summary

VectraRAT combines a Go-based management server with C++ Windows malware, distributed via ClickFix or Amadey. It features hidden desktop operation, credential harvesting, SOCKS5 proxy relay, and UAC bypass, rented starting at $250 per month.

3. Attack Flow

Flow 1: From ClickFix and Existing Malware to VectraRAT

  1. An attacker tricks users into executing commands via a fake ClickFix authentication page, or deploys VectraRAT using existing malware like Amadey on compromised hosts.
  2. The executed malware sets up a mutex and device identifier, then determines the C2 server from callback.json in the temp directory or embedded configuration.
  3. It establishes custom TCP communication with VectraHub. Analyzed configurations show TCP/3308 in use.
  4. Upon initial connection, it automatically collects browser credentials, network connection details, and configuration files.
  5. The attacker can operate a hidden desktop, shell, file transfer, clipboard, and SOCKS5 relay. Implementation of each feature and its execution scope on individual victim endpoints must be distinguished.

Flow 2: UAC Bypass Logic Confirmed in Sample Analysis

  1. Launches winver.exe as the target for debugging, obtains a handle to the debug object, and detaches from it.
  2. Reuses that handle to launch the auto-elevating computerdefaults.exe as the debug target.
  3. Obtains and duplicates the handle of the elevated process from debugging events.
  4. Launches subsequent programs with computerdefaults.exe as the parent, inheriting a high-integrity-level token. This requires conditions such as an administrator account and UAC settings, and does not mean elevation is possible for all standard users.

4. Attacker Position and Execution Location

5. Perspective of Victims and Administrators

Victims

Administrators

6. Conditions for Success and Failure

Success Conditions

Failure Conditions

7. What Happens Upon Success

8. Observable Logs

Email

Proxy / SWG / DNS

Endpoint / EDR

Identity / IdP

SaaS / Cloud

Network

9. Attack Success Determination

Confirmed via Public Information

Organization-Specific Criteria

10. Investigation Playbook

Triggers

Initial Triage

Endpoint / Server

Authentication / Cloud

Subsequent Activity

Containment

Decision Categories

11. Defense and Detection Ideas

Single Events

Timeline Correlation

Threat Hunting

Log Gaps

Priority Mitigations

12. Facts / Inference / Hypothesis

Facts

Inferences

Hypotheses

No additional hypotheses. Unconfirmed items are listed in "Unknowns and Further Investigation".

13. MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

14. Unknowns and Further Investigation

15. Impact on SOCs and Organizations

Enterprise Windows systems and servers are included in the observation targets, meaning investigations focused solely on user endpoints may overlook impacts. However, 48% represents the proportion of victim entries with OS information within a limited C2 log set. Organizations should correlate executing users, pre- and post-elevation privileges, configuration file access, and subsequent identity/cloud usage to investigate information gathering even when UAC bypass does not succeed.

16. Summary by Role